The Federal Court of Appeal recently released its decision in Canada (National Revenue) v. ConocoPhillips Canada Resources Corp., 2017 FCA 243. The background for the case is as follows: ConocoPhillips had been issued a reassessment of its 2000 taxation…
The Tax Court of Canada recently decided a new case under the general anti-avoidance rule (“GAAR”) in section 245 of the Income Tax Act. In Birchcliff Energy Ltd. v. The Queen, the Court held that the GAAR applied to restrict…
On October 13, 2017, the Federal Court of Appeal released its decision in Univar Holdco Canada ULC. v. H.M.Q. 2017 FCA 207 (“Univar”), overturning the trial decision at the Tax Court of Canada (2016 TCC 159). The judgment contained several…
Under the provisions of the Income Tax Act (the “ITA”), the CRA is authorized to inspect a taxpayer’s books and records and to require taxpayers to provide information and documents in the course of an income tax audit. However, the…
Taxpayers regularly argue that an administrative policy adopted by the Canada Revenue Agency (the “CRA”) constitutes an incorrect interpretation of the law that courts should reject. Courts sometimes side with these taxpayers, and choose not to follow the CRA’s administrative…
In Burlington Resources Finance Company v. The Queen, 2017 TCC 144, Madam Justice D’Auray considered a motion brought by the Crown to compel the Appellant to answer certain questions that were refused during an examination for discovery. In the…
“Rectification”, a means to “fix” a mistake made in the implementation of an agreement, has been a popular topic in tax law since the Supreme Court of Canada’s decisions limiting the availability of rectification for tax planning errors in AG…
If a year is to end with something that causes a bang, then the decision in Minister of National Revenue v. Iggillis Holdings Inc. and Ian Gillis Et Al., 2016 FC 1352 did just that. In reasons that are ambitious,…