
Professionals
|
| |
| Case Summary |
| |
Her Majesty the Queen (Appellant) v. Carma Developers
Limited (Respondent)
96 DTC 6569
Federal Court of Appeal
October 15, 1996
(Court File No. A-449-96.)
Settlement or extinguishment of debts -- Under court-approved plan, corporate
taxpayer's creditors assigning to taxpayer's parent the unsecured portion of
taxpayer's indebtedness owing to them -- Whether taxpayer's debts thereby "settled"
or "extinguished", resulting in application of section 80 of the Act
to reduce taxpayer's various non-capital losses, net capital losses and other
tax balances -- Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, Chapter 1 (5th Supp.), s. 80(1).
On January 31, 1986, the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta approved a plan worked
out with the taxpayer's creditors under the provisions of the Companies' Creditors
Arrangement Act. Under the terms of such plan ("the plan") the taxpayer's
three classes of creditors assigned to the taxpayer's parent corporation, CL,
the unsecured portion of the indebtedness owed to them by the taxpayer. The
Minister assessed the taxpayer for 1988 on the basis that, by virtue of the
plan, its debts had been "settled or extinguished" within the meaning
of section 80 of the Act. As a result, the taxpayer's net capital and non-capital
loss carry-forwards, as well as the capital cost of its depreciable property
and the adjusted cost base of its non-depreciable capital property were all
reduced. The taxpayer's appeal to the Tax Court of Canada was allowed. In essence,
the Tax Court concluded that the taxpayer's debts had continued in existence
under the terms of the plan, and hence could not be considered, at law, as having
been "settled or extinguished" within the meaning of section 80 of
the Act. The Minister was ordered to reassess accordingly. The Crown appealed
to the Federal Court of Appeal.
Held: The Crown's appeal was dismissed. The Tax Court judge
had made no reviewable error. There was evidence to support his findings and
it was not possible to say that his decision was the result of a palpable and
overriding error.
DOMINION TAX CASES
©2001, CCH INCORPORATED. All Rights Reserved.
|